Andean Community IP Guide · Decision 486

Andean Community
Trademark Coverage

Colombia · Ecuador · Peru · Bolivia — Decision 486 explained

🇨🇴 Colombia — SIC 🇪🇨 Ecuador — SENADI 🇵🇪 Peru — INDECOPI 🇧🇴 Bolivia — SENAPI
No regional trademark exists. Each country requires a separate national filing.

Check Coverage by Country

Select the countries where your client needs trademark protection. The tool will calculate approximate official filing fees per Nice class.

Estimated Official Filing Fees (per class)

Fees are official government charges per Nice class, per country, for the filing year 2025–2026. Attorney fees, translation costs, and local agent disbursements are additional. Colombia fees converted at approximate market rate for reference. All CAN countries operate under Decision 486 — filings are independent national applications, not a single regional registration.

No Regional Andean Community Trademark Exists

All four CAN member countries — Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia — adopt a harmonized legal framework under Decision 486 of the Andean Community. However, this harmonization does not create a single regional registration. Each country requires a separate national filing before its respective IP office. Protection granted in Colombia does not extend to Ecuador, Peru, or Bolivia, and vice versa.

CAN vs. Madrid Protocol

International IP attorneys frequently ask whether the Andean Community is comparable to the Madrid System. The table below clarifies the critical differences.

Feature CAN — Andean Community Madrid Protocol (WIPO)
Regional trademark registration ❌ Not available ✅ Yes — 130+ contracting parties
Single filing covers all members ❌ Must file per country ✅ One international application
Colombia member ✅ Decision 486 — CAN member ✅ Member since 2012 (Law 1455/2011)
Ecuador member ✅ Decision 486 — CAN member ❌ Not a member of Madrid Protocol
Peru member ✅ Decision 486 — CAN member ❌ Not a member of Madrid Protocol
Bolivia member ✅ Decision 486 — CAN member ❌ Not a member of Madrid Protocol
Harmonized substantive law ✅ Yes — uniform standards across 4 countries Partially — national law governs substantive examination
Opposition period 30 business days from publication Varies by designated country (typically 3–18 months)
Registration term 10 years, renewable indefinitely 10 years, renewable (international registration)
Filing language options Spanish (each national office) English, French, or Spanish (WIPO)

Key Provisions of Decision 486

Decision 486 — Common Intellectual Property Regime of the Andean Community — entered into force on December 1, 2000. These are the articles most relevant to trademark prosecution and enforcement.

Article 134
Protectable Signs

Any sign capable of distinguishing goods or services in commerce may be registered. This expressly includes words, names, acronyms, slogans, geometric figures, colors, combinations of colors, three-dimensional shapes (including packaging), sounds, and olfactory signs. The sign must be perceptible, sufficiently distinctive, and susceptible to graphic representation.

Article 136
Relative Prohibitions

Registration is refused for signs that are identical or confusingly similar to a prior mark covering identical or similar goods/services. Prohibition also applies to signs that reproduce, imitate, or translate a well-known trademark in any class, and to signs confusingly similar to a trade name, geographical indication, or appellations of origin already protected in any member country.

Article 135
Absolute Prohibitions

Registration is denied for signs that lack distinctiveness, have become generic or customary in trade, consist exclusively of descriptive elements (quality, quantity, destination, value, geographic origin), consist exclusively of colors not combined in a distinctive way, are deceptive as to nature, quality, or origin, or reproduce protected emblems (national flags, official seals, Red Cross).

Article 155
Rights Conferred by Registration

The registered trademark owner has the exclusive right to use it commercially, to prohibit third parties from using identical or confusingly similar signs, to prevent unauthorized importation of products bearing the mark, and to bring infringement actions. Rights are territorial — registration in Colombia does not confer rights in Ecuador, Peru, or Bolivia.

Article 238
Duration and Renewal

Trademark registrations are valid for 10 years from the grant date and may be renewed for successive 10-year periods indefinitely. Renewal applications must be filed within the last 6 months before expiration or within a 6-month grace period after expiration, subject to a surcharge. Non-use cancellation may be sought after 3 consecutive years of non-use.

Articles 146–148
Opposition Procedure

After formal acceptance of an application, the IP office publishes it in the official gazette. Any third party may file a written opposition within 30 business days of publication. The applicant has 30 business days to submit a counterstatement. After resolution of the opposition (and any appeals), the office issues a grant or refusal decision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Questions from international IP attorneys about the Andean Community trademark system.

Yes. Colombia acceded to the Madrid Protocol on August 29, 2012 (Law 1455 of 2011, declared constitutional by Colombia's Constitutional Court). International rights holders can designate Colombia through a WIPO international application — the SIC acts as the designated office and examines the designation under Decision 486 of the Andean Community, with an 18-month window to issue a provisional refusal.

However, if the SIC issues a provisional refusal or a third party files an opposition, local legal representation in Colombia is required. InLecta assists international IP firms with SIC responses, oppositions, and prosecution of Madrid designations for Colombia.

Note: Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia are not members of the Madrid Protocol — national filings at SENADI, INDECOPI and SENAPI respectively are the only route for those countries.
No. A trademark registration in Colombia confers exclusive rights exclusively within Colombian territory. The same principle applies to Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia. Decision 486 creates a harmonized legal framework — uniform definitions of protectable signs, shared absolute and relative prohibitions, and coordinated opposition procedures — but it does not create a unified regional trademark right. Each national registration is an independent IP asset. To obtain protection across all four CAN countries, four separate national applications must be filed, each examined independently by the relevant national IP authority.
The WTO's TRIPS Agreement sets minimum international standards for IP protection that all WTO members must meet. Decision 486 goes further in several respects — it is considered a TRIPS-plus regime. Key differences include: Decision 486 explicitly protects non-traditional marks (sounds, smells, 3D shapes) beyond TRIPS minimums; it provides detailed procedural harmonization across four national systems; it includes specific provisions on well-known marks that exceed TRIPS Article 16; and it establishes coordinated border enforcement measures under Articles 249–257. All four CAN members are also WTO/TRIPS members, so Decision 486 operates as the lex specialis regional overlay on top of their TRIPS obligations.